tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post5004539711205293967..comments2023-09-02T21:41:54.953-05:00Comments on ST-v-SW.Net: The Blog: Irony BombGuardianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01284444370958467313noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-63564162004822331132008-08-08T14:39:00.000-05:002008-08-08T14:39:00.000-05:00OH G2k. I just love watching you crush these pathe...OH G2k. I just love watching you crush these pathetic warsies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-18800914427192758542008-07-26T18:43:00.000-05:002008-07-26T18:43:00.000-05:00Yeah because it wouldn't be unreasonable to provid...<B>Yeah because it wouldn't be unreasonable to provide some context for your comments.</B><BR/><BR/>Sorry you didn't know what your friends had been saying through the years.<BR/><BR/><B>I'm not the one manufactoring death threats or hounding Paramount and Lucasfilm employees becuase I don't agree with the canon policy.</B><BR/><BR/>Neither am I. However, your friends have. <BR/><BR/><B>Remember this is my hobby, it's your life.</B><BR/><BR/>Er . . . okay. If that were so, wouldn't I write tons of daily posts on various forums and <I>not</I> have over a year since my last substantive update to the site? Wouldn't I have posted a reply within 15 minutes of your post, like you did mine? <BR/><BR/>I'm just sayin'. Don't get me wrong, your whole "IT IS YOU WHO ARE OBSESSED, NOT I!!!!!" routine is cute and all, but it falls flat. This is especially true considering I am clearly your Great Satan(tm) but you're just some barely-memorable nobody to me.<BR/><BR/>Have fun,<BR/><BR/>G2kAuthorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04784914528396175700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-54976022239979262322008-07-25T08:01:00.000-05:002008-07-25T08:01:00.000-05:00Yeah because it wouldn't be unreasonable to provid...Yeah because it wouldn't be unreasonable to provide some context for your comments.<BR/><BR/>As for my mental health, well I'm not the one manufactoring death threats or hounding Paramount and Lucasfilm employees becuase I don't agree with the canon policy.<BR/><BR/>Remember this is my hobby, it's your life.<BR/><BR/>PS. Thanks for the links.<BR/><BR/>~Have a wonderful day.Krytenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08782029467176464587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-18393809137905711222008-07-25T07:44:00.000-05:002008-07-25T07:44:00.000-05:00Ah yes, I remember the name Kryten.http://www.st-v...Ah yes, I remember the name Kryten.<BR/><BR/>http://www.st-v-sw.net/weblog/2008/02/history-regarding-spacebattles.html<BR/><BR/>You're the one for whom my every breath is mere proof that I am "the master of lies and deception". Wow . . . I'd forgotten how off your rocker you were. <BR/><BR/>Some things don't change, though:<BR/><BR/><B>I looked through that thread and saw nothing about a TIE fighter being able to "wipe the floor" with an Enterprise.</B><BR/><BR/>Where did I say it was in that thread, O suddenly (selectively) literalist one? Did you really have to look *that* hard to spin-doctor my words?<BR/><BR/>But I digress:<BR/><BR/>SDN 2002: Defiant would lose to Millennium Falcon. -<BR/>http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=2330<BR/><BR/>SDN 2004: The droid army from Attack of the Clones was sufficiently armed to shoot down the Enterprise had it appeared in the skies of Geonosis (p1) -<BR/>http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=47856<BR/><BR/>SDN 2004: A Federation starship will be rendered incapable of carrying out its mission (presented in the thread) if it takes a hit from TIE fighters. - <BR/>http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=59208 <BR/><BR/>SDN 2005: ISD-berthed fighter craft can destroy 20 Sovereigns. A Sovereign would have problems defeating the Falcon. Borg cube-busting transphasic torpedoes are SW "fighter grade" weapons (somewhat in jest). That was just page one. - <BR/>http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=69846<BR/><BR/>SDN 2005: A possible TIE weapon loadout option is more powerful than half the torpedoes of the Enterprise-D. (p7) -<BR/>http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=61260 <BR/><BR/>SDN 2007: A smaller-than-Falcon-sized unarmed SW freighter could destroy the Enterprise merely by its engine wash. -<BR/>http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=114706<BR/><BR/>And so on. You even give the Slave I example, though you obviously pretend that is not the equivalent of a TIE defeating the Enterprise.<BR/><BR/>Need I go on? Or shall I just continue to offend your lack of a sense of humor by making another crack about ridiculous-minded people (like Duke et al.) in reference to you specifically?<BR/><BR/>Grow up and get a clue. Quit taking yourself and the debate so seriously. It's obviously bad for your mental health, given your behavior in my comments.Authorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04784914528396175700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-25038955588377429302008-07-23T14:48:00.000-05:002008-07-23T14:48:00.000-05:00I looked through that thread and saw nothing about...I looked through that thread and saw nothing about a TIE fighter being able to "wipe the floor" with an Enterprise. And Mike himself uses Slave I as an example on the main site. I'd like to know where you got that.<BR/><BR/>I do like your comparison of SDN and Holocaust deniers though, it shows who's really crazy in this internet sub-culture.Krytenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08782029467176464587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-64954508891423196172008-07-23T14:47:00.000-05:002008-07-23T14:47:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Krytenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08782029467176464587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-62518699618147848562008-07-22T12:01:00.000-05:002008-07-22T12:01:00.000-05:00Yeah it did...Yeah it did...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12251252.post-35773783046723149592008-07-19T17:39:00.000-05:002008-07-19T17:39:00.000-05:00Does anyone else think Wong's posts sound like den...Does anyone else think Wong's posts sound like denial?Ilithi Dragonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10300247936272572280noreply@blogger.com