In reviewing galactic map details, I pondered the matter of who borders whom. The Federation, Klingons, and Romulans naturally have mutual borders, of course (though interestingly we've never heard of a "triangle region" outside of the non-canon). And we've heard explicitly of the Romulan and Cardassian borders with one another, a small bit of rearranging on the part of the DS9 folks to make the area more lively . . . after all, as some had earlier envisioned, Cardassia was to the "west" of the Federation along with the Ferengi, Talarians, and (later) the Tzenkethi, with the old-timer Klingons and Romulans to the "east".
But the question was whether the Klingons and Cardassians shared a border, or whether the Klingons had gone way out of their way to conquer, thus creating a non-contiguous Klingon Empire. To be sure, there were frequent mentions of the Klingon-Cardassian
border after "Way of the Warrior", but at that point the Klingon Empire
had conquered a section of Cardassian territory so the matter was
unimportant.
The answer, I think, comes from "Way of the Warrior"[DSN4]. Bashir and Garak refer to a "skirmish": the Betreka Nebula incident sparked an 18-year-long conflict between the Klingon Empire and the Cardassian Union. This strongly implies the presence of a border or near-border between the two prior to the invasion.
Just a note . . . probably obvious to some, but I just couldn't remember.
But the question was whether the Klingons and Cardassians shared a border, or whether the Klingons had gone way out of their way to conquer, thus creating a non-contiguous Klingon Empire. To be sure, there were frequent mentions of the Klingon-Cardassian
border after "Way of the Warrior", but at that point the Klingon Empire
had conquered a section of Cardassian territory so the matter was
unimportant.
The answer, I think, comes from "Way of the Warrior"[DSN4]. Bashir and Garak refer to a "skirmish": the Betreka Nebula incident sparked an 18-year-long conflict between the Klingon Empire and the Cardassian Union. This strongly implies the presence of a border or near-border between the two prior to the invasion.
Just a note . . . probably obvious to some, but I just couldn't remember.